Dryness & GSM faq

Can platelet-rich plasma (PRP) help vaginal dryness?

Can platelet-rich plasma (PRP) help vaginal dryness? Early studies suggest PRP may improve comfort for some people with genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), but evidence is small and mixed. UK guideline first lines remain moisturisers, suitable lubricants and, when needed, local vaginal oestrogen or DHEA; PRP is a potential add-on after these. Discuss benefits, limits, costs and alternatives before deciding. Educational only. Results vary. Not a cure.

Clinical Context

Who might consider PRP? Those with GSM whose main problem is entrance-focused burn or micro-tears despite a solid routine of moisturiser and compatible lubricant—especially if local oestrogen or DHEA is unsuitable or declined—or people who improved on local therapy but still have friction pain. Some explore PRP as an adjunct rather than a replacement.

Who should pause or avoid for now? Anyone with active BV/thrush/UTI, malodorous discharge, fever, severe pelvic pain, visible blood in urine, new post-menopausal bleeding, unhealed surgery, or poorly controlled bleeding risk. If your main barrier is pelvic floor guarding, start with pelvic health physiotherapy; injections cannot relax muscles.

Alternatives and next steps. Keep external care gentle (lukewarm water; bland emollient as a soap substitute), choose breathable underwear, and review irritants (perfumed washes/liners, tight sports kit, chlorine without rinsing). If symptoms persist, discuss targeted local oestrogen/DHEA placement and whether an adjunct such as PRP is justified. Plan review at 6–12 weeks to adjust towards the lowest effective maintenance. Educational only. Results vary. Not a cure.

Evidence-Based Approaches

Guideline first lines (UK): Patient-friendly NHS pages outline symptom basics and self-care for vaginal dryness. The NICE Menopause Guideline (NG23) recommends offering information on vaginal moisturisers and lubricants and considering low-dose local vaginal oestrogen when GSM affects quality of life; local options can be used with or without HRT.

Comparators with stronger evidence: Systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library show that local vaginal oestrogens improve dryness, soreness, dyspareunia and vaginal pH versus placebo across creams, tablets/pessaries and rings—providing the current benchmark for symptom relief.

PRP evidence (emerging): Peer-reviewed studies and overviews indexed on PubMed report small trials and case series of PRP in GSM and vestibular pain, suggesting potential benefit but noting heterogeneity in preparation, dosing and follow-up, and the need for larger, controlled trials before routine use.

Prescribing and product detail (for local therapies): UK product information and cautions for vaginal oestrogens and prasterone (DHEA) are listed in the British National Formulary (BNF). PRP kits/devices should meet UK medical-device standards and be used with documented consent and aftercare.

Applying the evidence: follow a stepped plan—foundations → local therapy if needed → consider PRP only as an adjunct when guideline-led measures are insufficient or unsuitable, with transparent discussion of benefits, limits, costs and maintenance, and with careful placement at the symptomatic entrance when relevant.