Why us?  Why us? please click dropdown
4.8/5 out of 3,500+ reviews
Regulated: CQC Registered | 1-5796078466
  • Verified Content: Approved by the Women’s Health Clinic Clinical Team.
  • Educational Use: This is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
  • Clinical Assessment: Individual suitability is determined by a clinician; results may vary.
  • Non-NHS: Private healthcare provider only. Pricing varies by treatment and site. Availability varies by clinical location.
  • MEDICAL EMERGENCY:

    If you need urgent help, use NHS 111. For a life-threatening emergency, call 999.

 Author  Find more about the author
Dr Farzana Khan

Dr Farzana Khan

Verified

Dr Farzana Khan qualified as an MD from the University of Copenhagen in 2003. She has worked in dermatology and obstetrics & gynaecology across the North of England and completed her MRCGP (CCT, 2013) and the Diploma of the Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Health (2013). Her clinical focus is vaginal health—including dryness/GSM, sexual function concerns, lichen sclerosus, and comfort or volume changes. She offers careful assessment, discusses medical and conservative options first, and considers selected regenerative or aesthetic treatments where appropriate. Dr Farzana also trains clinicians as a KOL/Trainer with Neauvia, Asclepion Laser, and RegenLab (since 2023). Ongoing CPD includes IMCAS, CCR, ACE and expert training in women’s intimate fillers, PRP, and polynucleotide injectables. Her approach is simple: clear explanations, realistic expectations, and shared decision-making. Authored and medically reviewed by Dr Farzana Khan.

MD MRCGP DFFP
Was this answer helpful?
Rate Dr Farzana's explanation

Assessment first
Evidence-aware
Safety focused

Women’s Health Clinic FAQ

Can the O-Shot help with burning or irritation?

The O-Shot is not the first assumption for burning or irritation. It may only be discussed after assessment if symptoms appear linked with local tissue fragility, dryness, or discomfort patterns where PRP could be relevant.

Direct answer

The O-Shot is not the first assumption for burning or irritation. It may only be discussed after assessment if symptoms appear linked with local tissue fragility, dryness, or discomfort patterns where PRP could be relevant.

The most useful plan starts with the underlying cause, not the treatment name. Your clinician should review symptoms, medical history, alternatives, expected benefits, limitations and safety.

Educational only. Suitability must be confirmed after consultation. Results vary. Not a cure.

Women's Health Clinic consultation for Can the O-Shot help with burning or irritation?
Consultation-led care

At a glance

These are the main points to understand before deciding whether this option is suitable.

At a glance

Clinical summary

Procedure Type

Non-surgical, autologous (using the patient's own blood) minimally invasive injection.

Mechanism of Action

Concentrated platelets release growth factors (like VEGF, EGF, PDGF) to reduce inflammation, promote revascularization, and restore vaginal mucosal.

Primary Uses for Irritation

Menopausal vaginal atrophy, vulvovaginal dryness, and Lichen Sclerosus.

Hormone-Free

It is entirely non-hormonal, making it a safe regenerative option for breast cancer survivors or those with oestrogen.

Important safety note

General Safety: Because PRP is derived from the patient's own blood (autologous), there is low but not absent risk of allergic reaction or rejection.

Consultation
Suitability
Evidence
Safety
Aftercare




Detailed answer

Detailed answer

• Evidence on Burning (GSM): A 2025 prospective study comparing PRP to topical oestrogen found that patients receiving PRP showed significant improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for burning and dyspareunia over a 12-week period (p=0. 031). Another cohort study noted that burning sensations decreased from 51% at baseline to 15.

Clinical context

Evidence on Burning (GSM): A 2025 prospective study comparing PRP to topical oestrogen found that patients receiving PRP showed significant improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.

Mechanism
Evidence
Symptoms
Alternatives

What it means

Evidence on Burning (GSM): A 2025 prospective study comparing PRP to topical oestrogen found that patients receiving PRP showed significant improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.

Why it happens

Evidence on Lichen Sclerosus: Clinical studies show that PRP injections in women with biopsy-proven Lichen Sclerosus unresponsive to steroid creams resulted in over 50% achieving complete relief.

Evidence limits

Alternative to oestrogen: Literature positions PRP as a highly promising alternative for women who have failed conservative therapies or who cannot undergo systemic or topical Hormone Replacement Therapy.

Treatment fit

Suitability depends on history, symptoms, examination where appropriate and discussion of alternatives.

What this means in practice

• Treatment Setting: In-office, outpatient procedure. • Procedure Time: The entire appointment usually takes 30 to 60 minutes, with the injection itself taking less than 10 minutes. • Cost: The procedure is elective and generally not covered by insurance.

• Initial Results: While some early sensitivity changes may occur, the regenerative process takes time. Initial symptom relief (such as a decrease in burning and irritation) typically begins to emerge at around 3 to 4 weeks post-treatment.





Patient safety

Why proper assessment matters

Assessment helps separate marketing claims from safe, individualised clinical decision-making.

It checks the cause

Evidence on Burning (GSM): A 2025 prospective study comparing PRP to topical oestrogen found that patients receiving PRP showed significant improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.

It protects safety

General Safety: Because PRP is derived from the patient's own blood (autologous), there is low but not absent risk of allergic reaction or rejection.

It reviews alternatives

Treatment Setting: In-office, outpatient procedure.

It sets expectations

Initial Results: While some early sensitivity changes may occur, the regenerative process takes time.

A clinical decision, not a shortcut

The safest final page should explain what the intervention may do, what it cannot promise, and when another route may be better.

Treatment should be discussed with realistic goals, informed consent, clear aftercare and a plan for review.





Considerations

What to consider

• Treatment Setting: In-office, outpatient procedure. • Procedure Time: The entire appointment usually takes 30 to 60 minutes, with the injection itself taking less than 10 minutes. • Cost: The procedure is elective and generally not covered by insurance.

Consultation priorities

Step 1: Consultation: A thorough medical history review to establish candidacy, rule out infections, and discuss expectations.

History
Consent
Aftercare
Follow-up

Before treatment

Step 1: Consultation: A thorough medical history review to establish candidacy, rule out infections, and discuss expectations.

During care

Step 2: Blood Draw & Processing: Around 10 to 30 mL of blood is drawn from the arm and spun in a specialised centrifuge for 5 to 10.

Aftercare

Step 3: anaesthesia: A strong topical numbing cream (e.g., lidocaine/prilocaine) is applied to the vaginal walls, clitoris, and labia for about 20-30 minutes to ensure comfort.

When to reassess

Step 4: Injection: The provider uses a very fine needle to inject the PRP strategically into the anterior vaginal wall, clitoris, and any areas specifically affected by irritation.

Practical expectations

Initial Results: While some early sensitivity changes may occur, the regenerative process takes time.

Procedure Time: The entire appointment usually takes 30 to 60 minutes, with the injection itself taking less than 10 minutes.





Common concerns and myths

Common misconceptions

Clear patient information should correct over-simple claims and keep expectations realistic.

Myth: Burning is automatically dryness.

Reality: suitability depends on the symptom pattern, medical history, contraindications, alternatives and individual goals.

Myth: Irritation means PRP is the next step.

Reality: results vary, evidence may be developing, and non-response should prompt reassessment.

Myth: Treating tissue quality is enough when infection or skin disease.

Reality: injections, devices and intimate procedures can still carry risks and need proper consent and aftercare.

Evidence and advertising

Evidence on Lichen Sclerosus: Clinical studies show that PRP injections in women with biopsy-proven Lichen Sclerosus unresponsive to steroid creams resulted in over 50% achieving complete relief.

Alternatives

Treatment Setting: In-office, outpatient procedure.





Safety checklist

Safety checklist

Use these questions to decide whether treatment should be discussed, delayed or redirected.

Has the cause been assessed?

Symptoms should be reviewed in context before selecting a treatment.

Are red flags absent?

General Safety: Because PRP is derived from the patient's own blood (autologous), there is low but not absent risk of allergic reaction or rejection.

Are alternatives clear?

Treatment Setting: In-office, outpatient procedure.

Is follow-up planned?

The clinic should explain aftercare, review timing and when to seek help.

Reassuring signs

Proceeding is more reasonable when goals are clear, red flags have been checked, and expectations are realistic.

Clear goals
No red flags
Follow-up plan

Reasons to pause

General Safety: Because PRP is derived from the patient's own blood (autologous), there is low but not absent risk of allergic reaction or rejection.

Pain
Bleeding
Infection




When to escalate

When to seek medical help

Some symptoms should be assessed before any elective intimate treatment. Use NHS 111 online

Severe or worsening pain

General Safety: Because PRP is derived from the patient's own blood (autologous), there is low but not absent risk of allergic reaction or rejection.

Bleeding or discharge

Common, Mild Side Effects: Patients may experience temporary mild pain, localised swelling, redness, a pinching sensation, or minor spotting/bruising at the injection site for a few days.

Infection signs

Red Flags (When to Seek Help): Severe or worsening pain, persistent or spreading redness, abnormal discharge, fever, signs of infection, or unusual loss of sensation.

Emergency symptoms

Call 999 in a life-threatening emergency, including collapse, chest pain or breathing difficulty.

Use NHS 111 for urgent advice or call 999 in a life-threatening emergency. This page is educational and does not replace individual medical assessment.

More clinical detail

Benchmark positioning

  • The safest high-ranking page wins by being clinically cautious first and commercially restrained throughout.

Clinical reality

  • Evidence on Burning (GSM): A 2025 prospective study comparing PRP to topical oestrogen found that patients receiving PRP showed significant improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for burning and dyspareunia over a 12-week.
  • Evidence on Lichen Sclerosus: Clinical studies show that PRP injections in women with biopsy-proven Lichen Sclerosus unresponsive to steroid creams resulted in over 50% achieving complete relief of symptoms, and nearly 90% showing clinical.
  • Alternative to oestrogen: Literature positions PRP as a highly promising alternative for women who have failed conservative therapies or who cannot undergo systemic or topical Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT).

Timeline and expectations

  • Initial Results: While some early sensitivity changes may occur, the regenerative process takes time.
  • Peak Efficacy: Maximum therapeutic benefits and full tissue regeneration are usually observed between 2 to 3 months following the injections.
  • Duration of Results: Results are not expected to be indefinite but generally last anywhere from 12 to 18 months (or up to 2 years for some patients).
  • Treatment Frequency: Depending on the severity of the condition (e. g.

Practical logistics

  • Treatment Setting: In-office, outpatient procedure.
  • Procedure Time: The entire appointment usually takes 30 to 60 minutes, with the injection itself taking less than 10 minutes.
  • Costs should be confirmed on the /pricing/ page before booking
  • Downtime: There is virtually zero downtime. Most patients can return to normal daily activities immediately.

Research sources

  • Atlihan U, et al. (2025). 'Comparison of topical oestrogen and platelet-rich plasma injections in the treatment of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy.' Frontiers in Medicine.
  • Behnia-Willison F, et al. (2016). 'Use of Platelet-rich Plasma for Vulvovaginal Autoimmune Conditions Like Lichen Sclerosus.' Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open.
  • Saleh DM, Abdelghani R. (2022). 'Clinical evaluation of autologous platelet rich plasma injection in postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy: a pilot study.' Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology.
  • Tedesco M, et al. (2020). 'Platelet-rich plasma for genital lichen sclerosus: analysis and results of 94 patients.' Journal of Dermatological Treatment.

Next step

Book a clinical consultation

A consultation can confirm whether this treatment may be suitable, whether another pathway should come first, and what realistic outcomes and aftercare would look like.

View Research Sources (12 Sources)
• Atlihan U, et al. (2025). 'Comparison of topical oestrogen and platelet-rich plasma injections in the treatment of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy.' Frontiers in Medicine. Demonstrated significant improvement in VAS scores for burning and dyspareunia with PRP therapy compared to topical oestrogen.
• Behnia-Willison F, et al. (2016). 'Use of Platelet-rich Plasma for Vulvovaginal Autoimmune Conditions Like Lichen Sclerosus.' Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. Found that PRP reduced symptoms and clinical signs in women unresponsive to topical steroids.
• Saleh DM, Abdelghani R. (2022). 'Clinical evaluation of autologous platelet rich plasma injection in postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy: a pilot study.' Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. Confirmed marked advancements in addressing burning, irritation, and dryness at the one-month follow-up.
• Tedesco M, et al. (2020). 'Platelet-rich plasma for genital lichen sclerosus: analysis and results of 94 patients.' Journal of Dermatological Treatment. Highlighted a significant decrease in subjective symptoms such as burning and itching post-PRP treatment.
• Role of platelet-rich plasma in pelvic floor disorders: A systematic review - PMC
• Fertility problems: assessment and treatment - NICE
• Interventional procedure overview of transvaginal laser therapy for urogenital atrophy - NICE
• NG257 Fertility problems: assessment and treatment - NICE
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence IP1817 Transvaginal laser therapy for urogenital atrophy - NICE
• Platelet-rich plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis | NICE interventional procedures consultation document
• What does NICE say about energy devices and sexual function symptoms?
• 22041403 vulval care_.indd - Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

These 12 source names are selected from 24 display-ready sources, with a raw audit trail of 445 imported records. Additional reviewed material included UK clinical guidance, professional society guidance, peer-reviewed clinical papers, evidence reviews; duplicate, low-relevance and non-clinical records were removed before display.

Educational only. Disclaimer: The information provided in this document is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. While Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) therapy has early clinical interest for treating vaginal burning, irritation, and conditions like GSM and Lichen Sclerosus, it is often used off-label. Individual results may vary. Always consult with an appropriately qualified healthcare professional or gynaecologist to obtain a proper diagnosis, discuss contraindications, and determine the safest, most appropriate treatment plan for your specific medical needs. Results vary. Not a cure.

Loading directory...