...
 Why us?  Why us? please click dropdown
4.8/5 out of 3,500+ reviews
Regulated: CQC Registered | 1-5796078466
  • Verified Content: Approved by the Women’s Health Clinic Clinical Team.
  • Educational Use: This is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
  • Clinical Assessment: Individual suitability is determined by a clinician; results may vary.
  • MEDICAL EMERGENCY:

    If you need urgent help, use NHS 111. For a life-threatening emergency, call 999.

 Author  Find more about the author
Dr Farzana Khan

Dr Farzana Khan

Verified

Dr Farzana Khan qualified as an MD from the University of Copenhagen in 2003. She has worked in dermatology and obstetrics & gynaecology across the North of England and completed her MRCGP (CCT, 2013) and the Diploma of the Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Health (2013). Her clinical focus is vaginal health—including dryness/GSM, sexual function concerns, lichen sclerosus, and comfort or volume changes. She offers careful assessment, discusses medical and conservative options first, and considers selected regenerative or aesthetic treatments where appropriate. Dr Farzana also trains clinicians as a KOL/Trainer with Neauvia, Asclepion Laser, and RegenLab (since 2023). Ongoing CPD includes IMCAS, CCR, ACE and expert training in women’s intimate fillers, PRP, and polynucleotide injectables. Her approach is simple: clear explanations, realistic expectations, and shared decision-making. Authored and medically reviewed by Dr Farzana Khan.

MD MRCGP DFFP
Was this answer helpful?
Rate Dr Farzana's explanation
faq Vaginal Laxity (postnatalmenopause support)

Are results permanent, and how often is maintenance needed?

Results from non-surgical options for perceived laxity—energy devices (laser/RF) and regenerative injectables (PRP, polynucleotides, superficial HA boosters)—are not permanent. Most women review progress at 3–6 months; if benefits are clear, some choose maintenance roughly 6–12 monthly. Durability improves when pelvic floor rehab and GSM care are consistent. Surgery can be longer-lived when structure is the driver, but still needs rehab. Educational only. Results vary. Not a cure.

Clinical Context

Who tends to maintain gains longest? Women who pair any procedure with consistent foundations: supervised pelvic floor training (activation, endurance, timing), scheduled moisturiser, a generous compatible lubricant (water-based for versatility/condoms; silicone-based for the longest glide), and—if acceptable—local vaginal oestrogen for GSM. Load management (treat cough/constipation, pace impact sport) also protects results.

Who may need earlier review or different routes? Those with suspected perineal scar malposition, a discrete fascial defect/prolapse beyond the introitus, or pain-dominant/overactive pelvic floor patterns. Devices/injectables cannot correct structure or persistent muscle discoordination; consider uro-gynae or pelvic health physio. Seek urgent assessment for fever, foul discharge, heavy bleeding, visible haematuria, or new post-menopausal bleeding.

Next steps now. Keep a 6–12-week diary (sting scores, micro-tears/spotting, air-trapping episodes, tampon stability, ease at first penetration). Reassess foundations before planning maintenance; escalate only if a specific gap remains and prior gains were meaningful.

Evidence-Based Approaches

NHS (patient-friendly foundations): Step-by-step pelvic floor guidance and practical GSM self-care underpin durability: NHS – pelvic floor exercises; NHS – vaginal dryness.

NICE urinary incontinence & prolapse (NG123): Emphasises supervised pelvic floor muscle training first-line with criteria for escalation, supporting a conservative-first, review-based pathway before and after any procedure. NICE NG123.

NICE menopause guideline (NG23): Recommends vaginal moisturisers/lubricants and considering low-dose local vaginal oestrogen when symptoms affect quality of life—central pillars for sustained comfort in GSM. NICE NG23.

Cochrane Library (PFMT and energy-based therapies): Method-rigorous reviews support PFMT effectiveness and highlight small, heterogeneous trials with short follow-up for device-based options—hence realistic expectations and maintenance only if clearly useful. Cochrane Library.

Peer-reviewed GSM context: Public abstracts explain how oestrogen decline alters mucosa, pH and microbiota—clarifying why continuing local therapy and friction control sustains comfort better than repeated procedures alone. PubMed – GSM overview.