Why us?  Why us? please click dropdown
4.8/5 out of 3,500+ reviews
Regulated: CQC Registered | 1-5796078466
  • Verified Content: Approved by the Women’s Health Clinic Clinical Team.
  • Educational Use: This is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
  • Clinical Assessment: Individual suitability is determined by a clinician; results may vary.
  • MEDICAL EMERGENCY:

    If you need urgent help, use NHS 111. For a life-threatening emergency, call 999.

 Author  Find more about the author
Dr Farzana Khan

Dr Farzana Khan

Verified

Dr Farzana Khan qualified as an MD from the University of Copenhagen in 2003. She has worked in dermatology and obstetrics & gynaecology across the North of England and completed her MRCGP (CCT, 2013) and the Diploma of the Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Health (2013). Her clinical focus is vaginal health—including dryness/GSM, sexual function concerns, lichen sclerosus, and comfort or volume changes. She offers careful assessment, discusses medical and conservative options first, and considers selected regenerative or aesthetic treatments where appropriate. Dr Farzana also trains clinicians as a KOL/Trainer with Neauvia, Asclepion Laser, and RegenLab (since 2023). Ongoing CPD includes IMCAS, CCR, ACE and expert training in women’s intimate fillers, PRP, and polynucleotide injectables. Her approach is simple: clear explanations, realistic expectations, and shared decision-making. Authored and medically reviewed by Dr Farzana Khan.

MD MRCGP DFFP
Was this answer helpful?
Rate Dr Farzana's explanation
Dryness & GSM faq

What does NICE say about energy-based treatments for dryness?

NICE guidance prioritises non-hormonal care (vaginal moisturisers and suitable lubricants) and—when symptoms affect quality of life—low-dose local vaginal oestrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). Energy-based vaginal treatments (laser or radiofrequency) are not first line; evidence quality is mixed and devices must meet UK medical-device rules with clear consent and follow-up. If considered, this should be after guideline-led care and an individual discussion of benefits, limits and risks. Educational only. Results vary. Not a cure.

Clinical Context

Who might consider energy-based care? People with GSM whose symptoms persist despite diligent non-hormonal care plus local treatment (oestrogen or DHEA), or those who cannot/choose not to use local hormones after an informed discussion. It’s most relevant when the main problem is friction-related soreness or micro-tears rather than deep pelvic pain (which suggests other drivers).

Who should avoid or delay? Anyone with active infection (thrush/BV/UTI), uninvestigated discharge or bleeding, recent surgery without clearance, suspected dermatoses (e.g., lichen sclerosus) without diagnosis, unmanaged pelvic floor over-activity, pregnancy, or device-specific contraindications (e.g., certain implants/pacemakers for RF). Red flags (fever, severe pelvic pain, malodorous green/grey discharge, visible haematuria, or new post-menopausal bleeding) require medical assessment rather than device escalation.

Next steps. Map symptoms and goals; optimise foundations; confirm diagnosis; then, if still interested, discuss session number, spacing, costs and maintenance. Plan a review 6–12 weeks after each step to adjust to the minimum effective regimen that maintains comfort.

Evidence-Based Approaches

NICE & NHS framing. See the NICE Menopause Guideline (NG23) for first-line GSM care (moisturisers/lubricants; consider low-dose local vaginal oestrogen). Patient-friendly symptom and self-care advice appears on the NHS page for vaginal dryness. UK device regulation principles and safety reporting are outlined by the national regulator (medical devices) at the MHRA.

Comparators with stronger evidence. Systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library consistently show that local vaginal oestrogens improve dryness, soreness, dyspareunia and vaginal pH versus placebo across creams, tablets/pessaries and rings. Peer-reviewed overviews indexed on PubMed summarise GSM mechanisms (thinner epithelium, raised pH, reduced lactobacilli) and place energy devices as emerging options with heterogeneous evidence.

Applying the guidance. Follow a stepped plan: moisturiser + suitable lubricant → add local therapy if needed → consider energy-based devices only when established measures are unsuitable or insufficient, ensuring UKCA/CE-marked use, informed consent and follow-up. ® belongs to its owner.